difference between tiger and lion in hindi

If a tiger were to meet a lion without cages or screaming fans, what would happen? That’s actually a question that some conservationists are having to answer right now. Craig Saffoe, a biologist at the Smithsonian Zoo, also generally favored the tiger, telling LiveScience, “What I’ve seen from tigers, they seem to be more aggressive they go for the throat, go for the kill. Whereas the lions are more, ‘I will just pound you and play with you.’”īut fighting in an arena, and even in a zoo, is quite different than fighting in the wild. When they met, the tiger severed the lion’s jugular vein in just one stroke. The tiger apparently found a gap in the fence, and made its way into the lion’s enclosure. It did, and the Gaekwad lost 37,000 rupees.Īnd in 2011, a tiger killed a lion with a single paw swipe in a run in at Ankara Zoo in Turkey. Before the fight began, those running the bettor set the odds at 1 to 37,000 that the tiger would win.

And in the late 1800′s, the Gaekwad of Baroda, an Indian ruler, arranged a fight between the two beasts. He told them that “back in the day of the Roman Coliseum, the smart money usually backed the tiger.” While we don’t have any great descriptions of the outcomes, ancient paintings of the event usually showed the tiger winning. In 1959, a reader asked the Spokesman-Reviewthis question, and the paper, in turn, asked William Bridges, the curator of publications at the Bronx Zoo. In ancient Rome, the tiger-lion face-off wasn’t uncommon. So it seems that the tiger would have a physical advantage over the lion.īut it turns out that we have some historical data to add to this conjecture, too. You might remember from high school health class that muscle weighs more than fat, which helps explain the tiger’s extra pounds.

Difference between tiger and lion in hindi